OBSERVATORY OF HATE - SEE. MONITOR. REACT.

Ethnic framing in Polish crime reporting (March 18-31, 2026)

In March 2026, Polish police dismantled an organized criminal group involved in counterfeiting banknotes, manufacturing methamphetamine, and money laundering. Among the seven people arrested were a Ukrainian citizen (a former intelligence officer), a Russian citizen, and at least two Poles who provided bank accounts for money laundering. We analyzed how the Polish media covered this case and discovered significant differences in approach that may influence differing perceptions of Ukrainians in Poland.

The most concerning report comes from TVP Info — a state-funded television channel that, in theory, is required to adhere to standards of balanced reporting and public broadcasting. Its editorial team framed the headline around the phrase “a former employee of the Ukrainian secret services” instead of focusing on the crime itself — the dismantling of a counterfeiting ring. Already in the first paragraph, TVP Info reinforces this message with the phrase “he did not act alone” — without specifying that Polish citizens are also among the accomplices. This choice evokes in the reader an association with a broader, organized threat from foreigners, while the actual picture of the case is far more complex. A similar mistake was also made by the regional outlet Twój Radom, whose headline “Ukrainian citizen counterfeited money” emphasizes nationality as the suspect’s primary characteristic, even though this is a secondary detail compared to the crime itself.

In contrast, the local media outlet Gazeta Wrocławska took the most balanced approach: the report begins with details of the crime, includes a separate subheading about the Russian accomplice, and presents the facts using direct quotes from police statements. One of the largest news portals of the country, Onet Wiadomości, also chose a more neutral headline, focusing on the location of the arrest rather than the suspect’s nationality. It is worth mentioning Kryminalki.pl — a website dedicated to crime news, which went beyond even tabloid loose standards: in their report, the suspect was called a “self-taught genius,” and the “mastermind of the operation,” and the scale of the crime was significantly exaggerated compared to the official press release.

An important detail that all four media outlets omitted is the fact that of the seven individuals detained, at least two—the ones who issued invoices in Katowice and Poznań — are most likely Polish citizens, yet none of the headlines reflected this. This clearly illustrates the mechanism of selective framing: the suspect’s foreign origin becomes the focus of the narrative, while the involvement of local citizens remains in the shadows. For a public broadcaster whose audience includes hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians and their Polish neighbors, this approach is not neutral but image-shaping that can fuel prejudice and hinder integration.


However, this case is not an isolated incident, but rather part of the outlet’s broader editorial policy. After only a short time, our monitoring noted another example of similar framing by the same broadcaster.

This concerns the dismantling of a large drug lab near Płońsk. The crux of the matter is the seizure of 90 kg of drugs intended for "kiboli" (local slang term for the football hooligan fans). However, the TVP Info website once again included the nationality of the two detainees in the headline (“Ukrainians were producing…”) and used the term “drug pandemic” in the metadata. This confirms a well-established pattern: we observed a similar approach in other TVP Info articles (“Crystal” worth a fortune. Ukrainians produced wholesale quantities of drugs”), where the focus shifted from exposing the network to the ethnic origin of those arrested.

In contrast to this approach, regional media outlets and those independent of state funding have taken a more balanced approach. In particular, the local Radio Płońsk and TVP3 Warszawa focused their coverage of the laboratory on police activities and the scale of the operation, without mentioning the suspects’ origins in their headlines. Major news portals such as Onet and Echo Warszawy also maintained the same professional distance. Moreover, regional media demonstrate symmetry in similar cases: if a foreigner is mentioned, local accomplices are also mentioned. This shows that neutral reporting is entirely possible and constitutes the standard of professional journalism.

Both cases clearly illustrate a common problem: when the media exaggerates the guilt of a few individuals to the point of labeling them a “national threat,” they cease to be a source of information and become a tool for stigmatization. The effects of such reporting are cumulative: readers become accustomed to viewing ethnicity through the lens of crime, which erodes public trust. We urge the editorial staff of TVP Info to take note of the experiences of regional media and to adhere to standards of impartiality, avoiding ethnic references where they are not essential to understanding the event. This approach to addressing sensitive topics constitutes a violation of public broadcasting standards, which compels us to classify TVP Info as a national broadcaster, despite its status as a public broadcaster on paper.


What would a neutral headline sound like?


For comparison, here are a few alternatives that would meet the standards of a balanced crime report without losing their informational value:

  • “Counterfeit bills across Poland: police dismantle criminal ring” — geographical scope as the main hook.
  • “Counterfeit 500-złoty bills turned out to be the work of an organized group from Sochaczew” — location and crime in the foreground.
  • “Seven people arrested in connection with counterfeiting, drugs, and money laundering” — the list of crimes as the main point, without emphasizing nationality.
This project is funded by the European Commission under the Equal Rights Program, which is financed through the CERV program funded by the European Commission under the “Citizens, Equality, Rights, and Values” program for the years 2021–2027

Funded by the European Union. The views and opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union or the Operator — the Stefan Batory Foundation. Neither the European Union nor the Operator can be held responsible for them.
Made on
Tilda